Press Releases

Homeowner assistance from $13 billion deal yet to materialize substantially, groups seek answers from Justice Department

Washington [July 28, 2014]— A group of community organizations from throughout the country submitted a Freedom of Information Act request this week to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), seeking specific answers to questions related to the November 2013 DOJ settlement agreement with JPMorgan Chase. The request for information comes at a time when the department has recently announced a similar settlement with Citigroup and is reportedly in ongoing negotiations with Bank of America.

The FOIA request asks the DOJ to provide detailed information on how the settlement is actually being implemented; along with the demographics of who is getting relief from the settlement and correspondence between the department and the appointed monitor, Joseph A. Smith, assigned to oversee the implementation of the settlement.

“This settlement was meant to bring relief to those most hurt by the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008,” the request letter states. “The Settlement Agreement called for $4 billion to be delivered in the form of relief to consumers. This relief could come in a variety of forms, including, principal reduction, loan modifications and anti-blight activities, as laid out in Annex 2 to the Settlement Agreement. Unfortunately, many homeowners have yet to see any of this relief.”

“People demanded that the bankers who crashed the economy be held accountable—some of us even went to jail demanding it,” said Kevin Whelan, National Campaign Director of the Home Defenders League. “The bankers bought their way out of jail, but the money hasn’t actually arrived to help the families who need it. The Home Defenders League and community groups across the country are using our rights as citizens to file this official request because people are still suffering across the country. Fulfilling the terms of their settlements is the least the banks can do.”

The FOIA request is the latest in a series of actions that have taken place nationwide in recent weeks, asking the DOJ to provide information and to hold the major banks accountable in past and future multi-billion-dollar settlements.

“Even with the landmark settlement, I have not received any principal reduction on my mortgage,” said Pina Orsillo Belgrano, a Realtor and entrepreneur from Seattle, Washington. “JPMorgan Chase intentionally misled me, and the modifications they offered me never included principal reduction and only reduced my monthly payments by $40.” Belgrano says she has struggled for years to get Chase to agree to a sustainable modification. Organizers from Washington Community Action Network and the national organization Home Defenders League forwarded her case along with other examples of the kind of borrower needing relief to officials at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and DOJ, but her loan was instead sold from Chase to a new servicer.

“Eight months after JPMorgan Chase entered into this mortgage settlement amid much fanfare, people in distressed communities in New York City and around the country have seen little relief,” said Josh Zinner, Co-Director of New Economy Project. “This follows the unfortunate pattern of prior mortgage settlements with the biggest banks, where promised relief has failed to reach the hardest hit communities. Regulators must draw the line—the public deserves to know whether Chase is providing principal reduction modifications in the neighborhoods where they are most needed.”

“Homeowners in California’s hardest hit communities are still wondering where the promised relief from the Chase settlement, and other settlements, has gone,” said Kevin Stein of the California Reinvestment Coalition.” Greater bank and servicer transparency is needed to ensure that homeowners in all communities have equal access to loan modifications so that families and neighborhoods can begin to recover from the crisis.”

Organizations signing the request letter include the Center for Popular Democracy; Home Defenders League; Action NCAction NowAlliance for a Just Society; California Reinvestment Coalition; Consumer ActionColorado Foreclosure Resistance CoalitionMinnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for ChangeNational People’s Action; New Economy Project and New Jersey Communities United.

A PDF of the letter is linked here.

###

The Home Defenders League is a national organization fighting against foreclosures and for a just resolution to the mortgage crisis including mass principal reduction for underwater homeowners.

Add your reaction Share


Citigroup Settlement: Will Consumer Relief Actually Arrive?

As news breaks of another settlement between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and a major U.S. bank, Citigroup, homeowners throughout the country are asking whether promised relief will arrive.

Many homeowners are concerned and skeptical this morning. More than six months after the DOJ settled with JPMorgan Chase, help has yet to come. Last week, struggling homeowners in 14 cities delivered a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, asking for his personal intervention on behalf of consumers.

“I never thought in a million years that I would be in this position of fighting Citibank to save my home of 18 years,” said Houston, Texas homeowner Robin Crawford. “We all used our taxpayer dollars to bailout the very same banks not willing to help stop foreclosures. Wall Street bankers should be criminally charged for taking the very homes that we worked so hard to keep.”

The $7 billion Citigroup settlement includes a $4 billion civic penalty and $2.5 billion in debt relief to homeowners.

“During the past year since the $13 million JPMorgan Chase settlement was announced, struggling homeowners and community advocates representing them have been waiting for the help that was promised,” the letter to Holder states. “It has yet to arrive and the bank has not announced any new relief programs. Nor have their been any new modifications. Instead, Chase and their competitors are often transferring servicing rights to newer mortgage companies not covered by recent or future settlements.

Read more

Add your reaction Share


Struggling Homeowners Skeptical of Justice Department, Bank of America Deal

Struggling Homeowners Skeptical of Justice Department, Bank of America Deal

Relief from $13 billion JPMorgan Chase Settlement yet to materialize 

Washington [June 16, 2014]— As recent news reports indicate that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is negotiating a potentially record-breaking settlement with Bank of America over the wrongdoing that led to the mortgage crisis, homeowners and advocates expressed skepticism that the billions of dollars of relief for homeowners reportedly included in the settlement will reach the families who need it.

“$17 billion is a lot of money. I wonder if there will really be any help for my family and families like mine, or will it be just another set of broken promises?” said Grace Alexander, a Newark, New Jersey homeowner with a mortgage from Bank of America.

Organizations representing struggling and “underwater” homeowners say that help from last year’s record $13 billion settlement with JPMorgan Chase has yet to arrive. While the bank has not announced any new relief programs, its website does offer information about the most recent settlement.

And housing counselors and homeowners have not noticed any new waive of modifications. Rather, they say, Chase and other major banks seem to be seeking to get such loans off their hands by transferring servicing rights to newer mortgage companies not covered by major mortgage settlements.

“Even with the landmark settlement, I have not received any principal reduction on my mortgage,” said Pina Orsillo Belgrano, a realtor and entrepreneur from Seattle, Washington. “JPMorgan Chase intentionally misled me, and the modifications they offered me never included principal reduction and only reduced my monthly payments by $40.” Belgrano says she has struggled for years to get Chase to agree to a sustainable modification. Organizers from Washington Community Action Network and the national organization Home Defenders League forwarded her case along with other examples of the kind of borrower needing relief to officials at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and DOJ, but her loan was instead sold from Chase to a new servicer.

“On paper, the Chase settlement had better consumer relief than the earlier National Mortgage Settlement, in that it requires the kinds of modifications that restore home equity and keep families in their homes, mostly principal reduction,” said Kevin Whelan, National Campaign Director of the Home Defenders League. The earlier settlement between the federal government, 49 state Attorneys General and five major banks allowed the banks to provide most of their relief in ways that still put families out of their homes—like short sales—or through business practices they would have engaged in anyway, like writing off second mortgages that are worthless if a first mortgage goes bad.

“There was public debate on whether the JPMorgan Chase settlement was too big or two small and anger over the fact that it was tax deducible,” Whelan said. “But now folks are wondering if it was simply a work of fiction.”

Years into the foreclosure crisis, many homeowners who suffered now well-documented abuses at the hands of major banks have lost their homes to foreclosure. The JPMorgan Chase settlement contained provisions that allowed the bank to get credit toward its settlement amount by helping such families through donating or selling properties at a discount and financing new mortgages for homeowners who had lost their homes.

Sergio Ceballos Aguilar hoped that such provisions would help him reclaim his home. A longtime Minneapolis resident, Ceballos says he was sold a predatory loan by JPMorgan Chase, a loan he attempted to have modified five times. He was foreclosed upon and evicted from his home while attempting to negotiate a modification—a practice, restricted under the National Mortgage Settlement and now illegal in Minnesota, called “dual-tracking.” Public pressure including dramatic protests by the group Occupy Homes Minnesota and support from his City Councilmember raised Sergio’s case into the national spotlight around the time of the JPMorgan Chase settlement. In the midst of significant media exposure, bank officials began actively negotiating with Sergio—only to stop drop contact and stop responding before working out an agreement.

“I want to be able to support my children with stable housing on the street they grew up on,” Ceballos said. “All we ask for is a fair negotiation, to sell my home back to me so that I can continue to pay for my home. It is terrible that JPMorgan is pulling the same trick on our country that it is pulling on me! First they negotiate, then they retreat before sealing the deal.”

Last week, the California Reinvestment Coalition (CRC) publicly urged the DOJ to require Bank of America to disclose who is helped under the consumer relief provisions of a potential agreement with the bank and who is not. The CRC called on the DOJ to require Bank of America to publicly disclose homeowner race, ethnicity, and census tract level data for people who seek assistance under the reported $5 billion in homeowner relief that may be included in the settlement.

###

The Home Defenders League is a national organization fighting against foreclosures and for a just resolution to the mortgage crisis including mass principal reduction for underwater homeowners.